´ó·¢ÁùºÏ²Ê

© 2024 WLRN
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
WLRN has partnered with PolitiFact to fact-check Florida politicians. The Pulitzer Prize-winning team seeks to present the true facts, unaffected by agenda or biases.

PolitiFact FL: DeSantis claimed some states allow ‘post-birth’ abortions. None do

A screenshot of video of a man interviewing another man.
(Screenshot via YouTube)
Republican presidential candidate Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis sits down for an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper in July 2023.

Republican presidential candidate Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said in a that some states allow abortion after an infant has already been born.

CNN host Jake Tapper asked DeSantis whether he would support a federal abortion ban as president. DeSantis, who ¹ó±ô´Ç°ù¾±»å²¹â€™s six-week abortion ban in April, said he would be a "pro-life president," but gave no direct answer.

"In some liberal states," he said, "you actually have post-birth abortions and I think that’s wrong."

READ MORE: Trump says he'll vote to uphold Florida abortion ban after seeming to signal he'd support repeal

Some on social media thought DeSantis , but the post-birth abortion claim is something that and have repeated for years, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022.

The claim was wrong then, and it is wrong now: Willfully terminating a newborn’s life is not legal in any state.

Gretchen Ely, a professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville's, college of social work who studies reproductive health, said the claim "couldn’t be more wrong."

She said these types of claims misleadingly try to equate an intervention that might take place in the third trimester when there’s a fetal anomaly with an elective abortion where someone can just decide after birth that they don’t want a baby.

When asked for evidence to support his claim, a DeSantis campaign aide pointed us to two resources, neither of which established that states sanction killing newborns.

One was a outlining Republican support for advocates say would require infants get medical care after attempted abortions. Opponents say the new bill is redundant under the ""

The other was a from the Charlotte Lozier Institute, an anti-abortion organization, that explored cases in which it said abortion attempts failed and babies were born. But it contained a number of irrelevant or erroneous citations. For example, that it cited referred to second-trimester abortions in Europe, not the U.S., and found that half resulted in live births, with most babies dying within minutes. The study’s authors said the abortions were sought because of anomalies or genetic abnormalities. The gestational age represents a range when many fetuses cannot yet survive independently.

It also cited as evidence but misrepresented the findings. The study’s lead author, told PolitiFact there’s "no such thing as a post-birth abortion."

Killing infants after birth is illegal

A California law parents from prosecution when they lose a baby after delivery because of a pregnancy-related complication. But permits infants to be killed after birth.

"No state allows post-birth abortions," said Lois Shepard, a University of Virginia law and biomedical ethics professor who has authored several books about end of life care. "First, an abortion refers to terminating a pregnancy, and a pregnancy does not continue after birth. But second, that would be killing a born human being, who is a person entitled to the equal protection of the laws, including prohibitions against murder. No state permits infanticide."

Ely said that some states will assist with later termination because of fetal anomalies, "but there is not a state, or probably any place in the world, that would allow someone to murder an infant after they were born."

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also rebutted the statement and said that "there is no such thing." Kelly Baden, vice president of policy at the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion-rights research group, called the claim "outrageous and false" and said the rhetoric has "no basis in evidence, facts or medical standards of care and serves only to place abortion providers and patients at risk."

Legal experts have also pointed to specific federal laws that apply to newborns:

  • The , passed in 1974 and since revised. The relevant portion makes certain types of federal funding for states conditional on their adopting policies to prevent withholding of treatment from newborns, including those with disabilities.
  • The  established that federal legal protections that applied to "persons" also covered children born at any stage of development, including after an abortion. 

Claim misrepresents how and why later abortions take place

Conservative claims about "post-birth" abortions or abortions "up to the moment of birth" appear to misinterpret what happens when a mother grappling with a life-threatening diagnosis is induced into labor and gives birth to a baby with a short life expectancy.

Families and doctors may choose to provide , a plan in obstetric and newborn care that aims to provide comfort to a baby when there is little or no prospect of long-term survival.

Some families choose this route when they learn during pregnancy that the baby has a genetic or structural condition that could mean the baby survives only minutes or days after delivery. These problems can sometimes surface by the end of the first trimester, but may not until halfway through the pregnancy, or later.

"In these cases, patients may decide to end their pregnancies through abortion, or to choose to give birth with options for palliative care. If patients choose the latter, the American Academy of Pediatrics has stated that (patients) should also be allowed to choose palliative care or attempted resuscitation in light of the high likelihood of death and significant degree of neurodevelopmental impairment that may result from birth," The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

READ MORE: PolitiFact FL: Debbie Mucarsel-Powell misleads on Rick Scott’s position on abortion exceptions

of abortions in the U.S., about 91%, occur in the first trimester. Only about 1% take place after 21 weeks, and far less than 1% occur in the third trimester.

Dr. Nisha Verma, an OB-GYN who provides full-spectrum reproductive health care, including abortions, reiterated the rarity of abortions late in a pregnancy. But she said she’s had patients who received terrible fetal diagnoses and needed abortions in the third trimester. She gave an example of a baby who didn’t develop a brain and wouldn’t survive after birth.

"I have also had patients diagnosed with life-threatening medical conditions during the third trimester that require delivery," Verma said. "In these situations, I counsel my patients about the options, and in many situations, based on my patient's wishes, proceed with an induction of labor or C-section that aims to protect both the patient and the baby."

Overall, reproductive health experts said the language many politicians are using around abortion spreads false information that risks the lives and wellbeing of physicians and patients.

"It's purposely misrepresenting medical terms that are understood differently by the lay public," Ely, from the University of Tennessee, said. "Like ‘late term abortion,’ which is not a real medical term that’s been crafted carefully to try to make people think that you could have an abortion in some liberal state like New York all the way up to, and after, a baby’s been born. But that is completely counter to the laws of the land and our moral compass as humans."

Our ruling

DeSantis claimed that "some liberal states" have post-birth abortions.

There is no evidence to support this.

Killing an infant after birth is infanticide and is illegal in all 50 states. Situations resulting in a fetal death in the third trimester are exceedingly rare, and involve emergencies such as fetal anomalies or life-threatening medical emergencies affecting the mother.

Sometimes, labor is induced, followed by palliative care, for babies with very short life-expectancies. Some families choose this option when faced with life-threatening diagnoses that often limit their babies’ post-birth survival to just minutes or days after delivery, experts said.

We rate DeSantis’ claim False.

Our Sources

  • YouTube, , July 18, 2023
  • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, , Accessed July 20, 2023
  • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, September 2019
  • Guttmacher Institute, , Updated July 1, 2023
  • The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, , Accessed July 20, 2023
  • PolitiFact, , Feb. 28, 2019
  • PolitiFact, April 6, 2022
  • Phone interview, Gretchen Ely, a professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville’s, College of Social Work, July 19, 2023
  • Email interview, Lois Shepherd, professor of law and biomedical ethics at the University of Virginia and author of the books "Rationing Health Care at the End of Life" and "If That Ever Happens to Me: Making Life and Death Decisions After Terri Schiavo," July 19, 2023
  • Email interview, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists press team, July 20, 2023
  • Email interview, Kelsey Rhodes, interim director of voice and communications at Physicians for Reproductive Health, July 19, 2023
  • Email interview, DeSantis campaign press team, July 19-20, 2023
Samantha Putterman is a fact-checker for PolitiFact based in Florida reporting on misinformation with a focus on abortion and public health.
More On This Topic